Multifamily Due Diligence Checklist

44 deal-killer checks · free and printable · last reviewed 2026-07-22

Most multifamily due diligence guidance is written for institutions: acquisition teams, standing lender relationships, a budget for every third-party report. A 5 to 50 unit building gets bought differently. One person reads a T12 the seller's bookkeeper assembled, walks the units on a Saturday, and signs a personal guarantee at a local bank, and the mistakes that hurt are the ones nobody was checking for.

This page holds the short list for that buyer: the checks that most often kill, reprice, or delay small multifamily deals, arranged so what you can verify for free comes before what you have to pay to learn.

How to use this checklist

  • Work top to bottom: it is ordered so the cheap questions come before the expensive reports.
  • Check items off as you go (saved in your browser), or print it and take it to the property.
  • Get every answer in writing. A verbal answer to a deal-killer question is not an answer.

This page covers the checks that most often change price, timing, or closing confidence. It is deliberately the short list. The complete diligence library inside CREscope runs 220 checks for multifamily deals, with per-deal tracking, document linkage, and status, so the routine work does not fall through the cracks either.

0 of 44 checked(saved in your browser)

T12 forensics 0/6

The trailing twelve months is the deal's opening statement. Cross-examine it.

  • Small buildings run on owner-kept books, so the T12 in the offering package is a claim, not a record. Bank statements and filed returns were prepared for audiences the seller could not charm, and where the three disagree, the disagreement is the finding.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A T12 assembled for the sale that cannot be traced to statements, or rental income on the Schedule E telling a much smaller story than the broker package.
    Verify with:
    A full year of bank statements (two is better), the seller's Schedule E or entity return for the property, and the monthly T12, matched line by line.
    Next move:
    Underwrite the number the sources agree on. Where they diverge, the documented number wins the argument.
  • The annual figure hides the story: a rent push in the quarter before listing, a repair line that goes silent the same months, a one-time credit dressed up as a lower run rate. Sale preparation is visible in the monthly columns and invisible in the summary.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A trailing-three-month pace far above the trailing twelve, presented as the building's new normal.
    Verify with:
    The full monthly statement rather than an annualized one, with every month that breaks pattern explained in writing.
    Next move:
    Underwrite the durable run rate, and treat pre-listing improvements as unproven until the leases behind them season.
  • A seller heading to market has two easy levers: stop fixing things, and reclassify repairs as capital improvements. Either one flatters the expense ratio without changing the building, and the ledger detail usually shows the fingerprints.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Repair and maintenance spending that falls off a cliff in the final year while the units tell a different story.
    Verify with:
    Two to three years of operating statements side by side, the general ledger detail behind the repair and capital accounts, and whatever invoice history exists.
    Next move:
    Rebuild the expense base from the older years and the building's actual condition, not from the listing-year diet.
  • Loss-to-lease, the gap between in-place rents and claimed market rents, is the standard upside pitch on small buildings, and the claimed market rent is doing all the work in that math. It usually arrives without evidence from the one place that counts: this property's own leasing history.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Market rents justified by the nicest building in the neighborhood while the subject's own recent leases sign well below the pitch.
    Verify with:
    The most recent signed leases at the property with dates and concessions, plus what comparable vacant units nearby actually quote when you inquire as a prospective tenant.
    Next move:
    Underwrite to rents the building has demonstrated. Anything above that is a project with vacancy, turn cost, and time attached, and should be priced like one.
  • RUBS, pet rent, parking, laundry, storage lockers, and fee income count only if the leases support them and tenants actually pay them. On small buildings these lines are often aspirational, living in the pro forma rather than the ledger.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Utility reimbursement income with no billing history behind it, or fees that appear for the first time in the offering materials.
    Verify with:
    Lease language for each income line, the collection history in the ledger, and the local rules on utility pass-throughs where they apply.
    Next move:
    Underwrite the other income that is documented and collected. Zero the rest or treat it as upside work.
  • Physical vacancy is one number. Concessions, delinquency, bad debt, and non-revenue units are four more, and owner-kept books rarely separate any of them. The spread between gross potential rent and collected cash is the honest occupancy figure.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A vacancy number with no delinquency or concession detail behind it, on a building where several tenants are quietly months behind.
    Verify with:
    Gross potential rent against actual collections for twelve months, the delinquency aging, and a list of any units used for storage, staff, or the owner's family.
    Next move:
    Underwrite collected cash. A leased unit that does not pay is a workout, not income.

The rent roll, lease by lease 0/5

The rent roll is a summary somebody typed. The lease files are the contracts you are actually buying.

  • At this unit count you can read every lease, so read every lease. Missing files, expired terms honored informally, and side agreements written on the back page are standard small-building findings, and each one is a gap between the roll and your rights.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Files the seller cannot locate, roll rents that do not match the signed documents, or handwritten amendments nobody disclosed.
    Verify with:
    The complete signed file for every unit (lease, amendments, addenda) checked against the rent roll line by line.
    Next move:
    Make the roll match the paper before you price off it, and get any informal arrangement documented or ended at closing.
  • A building full of month-to-month tenants is flexible and fragile at once: easy to reposition, easy to empty by accident. A stack of leases expiring in the same quarter is turnover risk with a date on it.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Most of the roll on month-to-month with long-ago start dates, at rents nobody has reviewed in years.
    Verify with:
    A lease-term schedule showing every unit's start date, current term, and expiration, built from the files rather than the roll.
    Next move:
    Plan renewals and any repositioning around the real calendar, and underwrite turnover for the clusters you inherit.
  • Filling units on the way to market is the oldest move in small multifamily: friends, relatives, and marginal applicants at headline rents that make the T12 sing until they stop paying, shortly after your closing.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A cluster of new leases at the top of the rent range signed just before the listing date, with thin or missing application files.
    Verify with:
    Application files, screening reports, payment history since move-in, and deposit records for every recent lease.
    Next move:
    Underwrite recent leases at the credibility of their files, not their face amounts, and ask directly whether any tenant is related to the seller.
  • Whoever is behind on rent at closing becomes your collections problem, on the local court's timeline rather than yours. Eviction cost and duration are set by jurisdiction, and they vary enormously.

    Bad answer looks like:
    No aging report exists, or several tenants sit months behind with no filings started and no explanation offered.
    Verify with:
    The delinquency aging by tenant, any payment plans in writing, the status of current eviction filings, and a conversation with a local landlord-tenant attorney about the process you would inherit.
    Next move:
    Underwrite delinquent units as workouts with legal timelines, and price the resolution rather than the scheduled rent.
  • Deposits are tenant money you must produce later, and some states dictate how they are held and transferred at sale. Prepaid rent is revenue the seller already collected for months you will be the one servicing.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A deposit ledger that does not match the leases, deposits commingled beyond reconstruction, or no ledger at all.
    Verify with:
    The deposit ledger against every lease file, the account where deposits actually sit, your state's transfer requirements reviewed with counsel, and the proration schedule.
    Next move:
    Get every deposit and prepaid dollar transferred or credited the way your state requires, unit by unit, on the settlement statement.

Unit interiors, sampled like an audit 0/4

The seller's tour shows the units the seller chose. Your sample decides what the other units cost.

  • At 5 to 50 units, seeing everything is feasible, and reluctance to show a unit is itself information. The doors you are steered past are where the deferred maintenance and the undisclosed occupants live.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Access granted to a hand-picked few, or units that stay mysteriously locked across every scheduled visit.
    Verify with:
    An inspection right in the purchase contract covering all units, exercised with a camera and a per-unit condition form before contingencies expire.
    Next move:
    Any unit you could not enter gets underwritten at worst-case condition, in writing, in your model.
  • A down unit is capital work priced as if it were vacancy. What took the unit offline, and what it takes to bring it back, are the actual questions, and the answer is usually more than paint.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Units offline for years with vague explanations, or a scope of work that exists only as the seller's verbal estimate.
    Verify with:
    Your own walk of every offline unit, contractor bids for the real scope, and permits for any work already started.
    Next move:
    Underwrite each down unit as a project with a bid, a timeline, and lease-up risk, or exclude its income entirely.
  • Interiors are where system problems announce themselves: ceiling stains that map the roof and the stacks, breakers that trip on space heaters, moisture at the envelope's weak corners. One unit is an anecdote; the same finding in five units is a capital item.

    Bad answer looks like:
    The same water stain in vertically stacked units, or a musty smell the seller attributes to housekeeping.
    Verify with:
    A per-unit condition log from your walk, cross-read for repeats, then handed to your inspector to chase the worst clusters to their source.
    Next move:
    Convert every repeated finding into a system-level question with a professional answer before the inspection window closes.
  • Dens get marketed as bedrooms and converted spaces get marketed as units, but what a space can rent for follows what it legally and physically is.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A bedroom without the light, ventilation, or egress local code requires, a basement apartment with a hotplate for a kitchen, or floor plans that do not match what you walked.
    Verify with:
    Your own count of units and bedroom configurations against the rent roll and the marketing, cross-checked against the certificate of occupancy covered below.
    Next move:
    Re-underwrite any unit whose marketed configuration outruns its real one.

Building systems and the capital clock 0/6

Small multifamily trades in buildings old enough to be on their second or third generation of everything. Date the systems, then price the ones whose time is up.

  • Roof replacement is among the largest single checks a small building writes, and a flat or low-slope roof with multiple layers can conceal deck damage that turns replacement into reconstruction.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Stains on top-floor ceilings, patches layered on patches, and no invoice for roof work in anyone's records.
    Verify with:
    A roofer's inspection covering age, layer count, and remaining life, plus your own look at top-floor ceilings and whatever attic or deck access exists.
    Next move:
    Near-end-of-life roofing enters the price conversation with a bid attached, not an allowance.
  • Buildings of this vintage commonly carry original galvanized supply lines, cast iron stacks, or clay laterals, and some later ones carry polybutylene. Material determines the failure mode and the bill, and the sewer lateral is the most expensive pipe nobody looks at.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Weak pressure on upper floors, rust-tinted water after a vacancy, moisture at the base of the stacks, and no repipe records.
    Verify with:
    A plumber's identification of supply, waste, and gas piping materials, pressure and flow checks at the farthest units, and a camera scope of the lateral out to the main.
    Next move:
    Price repipe and lateral work off the materials actually found, and bring the camera footage to the negotiation.
  • Undersized service, panel models with documented failure histories, and era wiring such as aluminum branch circuits turn up constantly in this stock. Insurers increasingly ask about all of it before binding, so the electrician's findings reach your premium as well as your budget.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Fuse boxes still in service, double-tapped breakers, scorch marks at a panel, or an insurer that balks once the photos arrive.
    Verify with:
    A licensed electrician's review of service size, panel condition, and branch wiring across a sample of units, with photos your insurance broker sees early.
    Next move:
    Budget the electrical work as a safety item first and a capital item second, and get insurer comfort before contingencies expire.
  • A central boiler with building-paid heat is a different business than individual furnaces on tenant meters. Equipment age drives the capital plan, and the metering arrangement decides what every winter costs you.

    Bad answer looks like:
    An original boiler running past its design life with no service history, or building-paid heat underwritten as though tenants paid it.
    Verify with:
    Service records and ages for every heating and cooling component, the metering configuration unit by unit, and who has actually been paying each bill.
    Next move:
    Capital-plan replacements on real ages, and underwrite utilities exactly as metered today rather than as you hope to convert them.
  • Water is the patient enemy of small buildings: grading that slopes toward the foundation, dead gutters, spalling brick, rot behind overgrown landscaping. Structural movement is rarer, and it reprices deals wholesale when it appears.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Step cracks tracking through masonry, doors that will not latch along one side of the building, or a damp basement explained as normal for the age.
    Verify with:
    A general inspection with specific attention to grading, drainage, and foundation, escalated to a structural engineer the moment anything suggests movement.
    Next move:
    Structural questions get engineered answers before you waive anything. Everything else gets a bid and a line in the capital budget.
  • Small-building sellers renovate from memory: the roof was recent, the plumbing was redone, the electrical was updated. Paper separates the work that happened from the work that got talked about.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Improvement claims with no invoices, nothing in the city's permit history, and no contractor name attached.
    Verify with:
    Invoices and permit records for each claim, checked against the jurisdiction's permit portal, plus a call to the contractor where the item is expensive.
    Next move:
    Treat unpapered work as never done, and confirm papered work was permitted where a permit was required.

On small multifamily the fatal legal questions are usually municipal: what the city says the building is, and what the city lets you do with it.

  • Extra units accrete into small buildings over decades: finished basements, split floors, converted garages. Income from a unit the certificate of occupancy does not recognize can be ordered to stop, and lenders and insurers will only price the building the paperwork can verify.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A building marketed with more units than its certificate shows, or no certificate anyone can produce.
    Verify with:
    The certificate of occupancy or the jurisdiction's equivalent records, permit history for any added units, and zoning confirmation of the allowed density.
    Next move:
    Price the building on its legal unit count, and treat legalizing anything beyond it as entitlement work with an uncertain outcome, assessed with counsel.
  • Rent stabilization, just-cause eviction, notice periods, and relocation-payment obligations now exist at state and local levels in a growing set of jurisdictions, and coverage can turn on building age, unit count, or ownership structure. Your renewal and repositioning plan needs a legal review before it deserves a spreadsheet.

    Bad answer looks like:
    An underwriting model whose rent increases or unit turns the applicable ordinance would not permit, or a seller who has never heard of the local rules.
    Verify with:
    The statute and ordinance text for the jurisdiction this building actually sits in, applied to the building's specifics by a local landlord-tenant attorney.
    Next move:
    Underwrite inside the rules as counsel reads them, and build the required notices and timelines into your plan from day one.
  • Housing-code files are public and cumulative. Open violations convey with the building, and a long pattern of complaints describes both the building and the tenancy before you inherit either.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Open orders the seller did not disclose, a standing date in housing court, or the same complaint recurring in the file for years.
    Verify with:
    The code-enforcement and housing-department file for the address, requested directly from the jurisdiction, plus any pending litigation touching the property.
    Next move:
    Cost the cure for everything open, and make escrowed resolution or a price adjustment part of the contract.
  • Buildings built before 1978 fall under federal lead-based paint disclosure rules, and renovation in them triggers additional federal work-practice requirements. Asbestos in flooring, insulation, and pipe wrap from the same era constrains how you renovate. These are compliance obligations with penalties, not just inspection findings.

    Bad answer looks like:
    No disclosure records at all, deteriorated paint in family units, or a renovation plan that never mentions containment.
    Verify with:
    The disclosure documentation, any existing lead or asbestos assessments, and the applicable federal and state requirements reviewed with counsel or a qualified environmental consultant before work is planned.
    Next move:
    Budget compliant renovation practices into every turn, and have counsel size any exposure the seller's past practices created.
  • Voucher tenancies come with housing-authority contracts, inspection cycles, and payment procedures, and the subsidy does not simply follow the deed: the housing authority has its own approval and paperwork before payments continue to a new owner. They can be excellent, stable income, governed by rules you need to actually know.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Voucher units failing housing-authority inspections, abatement notices in the file, or a seller unsure which tenancies carry contracts at all.
    Verify with:
    Each housing assistance payments contract, the inspection history with the housing authority, and the authority's process for transferring payments to a new owner.
    Next move:
    Start the ownership-transfer paperwork with the housing authority early, and underwrite the inspection standard as a real operating obligation.
  • Many cities license or register rental buildings, some inspect on a cycle or at turnover, and some tie the license to code compliance. In certain jurisdictions an unlicensed rental faces consequences that reach collections and eviction rights, which makes the license a financial document, not a formality.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A building never registered in a city that requires it, with penalties accruing to whoever owns it next.
    Verify with:
    The jurisdiction's rental licensing and inspection requirements, the building's current standing, and the transfer process, confirmed with the city and reviewed with counsel where the consequences are unclear.
    Next move:
    Make current licensing, or a priced path to it, a condition of closing.

Working through this on a live deal? Track it in CREscope with the full diligence library, deal by deal.

Title, boundaries, and environmental history 0/4

  • Decades of small-building ownership leave tracks on title: shared driveway agreements, utility easements through the parcel, access rights, old liens never released. Any of them can constrain parking, financing, or the renovation plan.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A commitment ordered late, exception documents nobody requested, or a shared-drive arrangement that exists only as neighborly habit.
    Verify with:
    The full title commitment with each exception document pulled and read, by you and by title counsel.
    Next move:
    Resolve, endorse, or price every exception before your contract's objection deadline.
  • Small urban parcels hide encroachments in plain sight: the neighbor's fence, a shared curb cut, parking that has always spilled onto land the seller never owned. Parking count can be a zoning requirement, so losing spaces to a boundary reality can push the building out of compliance.

    Bad answer looks like:
    No survey, a survey older than the fences, or required parking that turns out to sit on the neighbor's parcel.
    Verify with:
    A current ALTA survey where the deal warrants one (a strong local boundary survey otherwise), checked on foot against the fences, paving, and parking you can see.
    Next move:
    Encroachments and parking shortfalls become endorsements, recorded agreements, or price adjustments before closing, not disputes after.
  • The signature small-multifamily finding is the buried or abandoned heating-oil tank, common in older stock in many regions, alongside the usual neighbors: a former dry cleaner or filling station on the corner, fill dirt of unknown origin. Cleanup exposure can land on a new owner depending on the facts and the state's rules, and lenders check even when buyers do not.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A converted heating system with no record of what happened to the old tank, unexplained vent pipes in the yard, or a seller who waves the question off.
    Verify with:
    The building's heating history, tank records with the fire marshal or environmental agency, a tank sweep wherever oil heat ever existed, and a Phase I environmental site assessment where the history or the lender warrants one.
    Next move:
    Any tank or recognized condition gets professionally assessed before contingencies expire, with remediation priced or escrowed rather than assumed.
  • Flood zone placement moves the insurance bill, the lender's conditions, and whether below-grade apartments are durable income at all, and basement units are often the marginal income that made the asking price work.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A mapped flood zone the listing never mentioned, or basement apartments in a building whose sump pump is running on a dry day.
    Verify with:
    FEMA's current mapping for this parcel with a written determination, and quotes for flood coverage wherever the zone requires it.
    Next move:
    Put the real insurance number in the model before contingencies expire, and underwrite basement units for the zone they sit in.

The expenses you will actually pay 0/5

Owner-managed books understate every cost the owner absorbed personally. Rebuild the sheet as if you had to hire for all of it.

  • In many jurisdictions a sale can trigger reassessment or otherwise change the tax bill, and on small multifamily the resulting jump can consume a painful share of the claimed cash flow. Few underwriting mistakes are more common in this asset class, and few are cheaper to avoid.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A pro forma carrying the seller's tax bill forward through the whole hold, untouched.
    Verify with:
    The assessor's reassessment practice for sales in this jurisdiction (a phone call), the current rates, and how recently traded buildings nearby were reassessed after their sales.
    Next move:
    Underwrite the post-sale tax bill the assessor's own process points to, and check whether any appeal or phase-in softens it.
  • Insurance on older small multifamily has moved from a line item to a deal factor. Roof, wiring, plumbing, and heating ages now drive eligibility, and some carriers have stepped away from whole vintages of building. The seller's premium tells you what the seller was paying. It says nothing about the quote you will get.

    Bad answer looks like:
    One quote arriving the week contingencies expire, conditioned on system replacements nobody budgeted.
    Verify with:
    Loss runs covering the last five years, obtained via the seller's broker, and multiple binding-level quotes from your own, with the system ages disclosed honestly.
    Next move:
    Underwrite the quoted-forward premium, and fold any insurer-required work into the capital plan.
  • Master metering, building-paid heat or water, and shared hot-water systems put consumption risk on the owner, and sellers tend to quote utility costs from memory. Converting to tenant-paid billing is a real project with hardware, lease, and sometimes regulatory steps, not a stroke of the pen.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Utility expense lines far below what twelve months of actual bills show, or a conversion assumption with no read on feasibility or local rules.
    Verify with:
    Twelve months of actual bills for every account, the metering configuration confirmed at the building, and the local rules for any billing change you plan.
    Next move:
    Model the bills as they run now, and treat conversion as priced upside on its own timeline.
  • A self-managing owner's books show no management fee, no leasing cost, and no maintenance labor, because the owner was all three. Underwriting your own free labor into the deal means buying a job and calling it yield, and it quietly breaks the exit math for the next buyer too.

    Bad answer looks like:
    An expense sheet with no management line, defended with the sentence 'I'll handle it myself.'
    Verify with:
    Quotes from local property managers for a building this size, plus an honest count of the hours the current owner puts in (ask them directly).
    Next move:
    Underwrite full-freight management. If you self-manage anyway, the saved fee is compensation for work, not extra return.
  • Trash, landscaping, laundry-machine leases, pest control, snow: a small building carries a modest stack of contracts with auto-renewals built to be forgotten. Municipal utility accounts deserve their own look, because in some places unpaid balances follow the property rather than the person.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A laundry lease with years to run at terms that made sense for someone else, or a water account in arrears that becomes your problem at closing.
    Verify with:
    Each contract in its written form, with the term, cost, and assignment language read rather than assumed, plus a status letter for every municipal account.
    Next move:
    Assume or terminate each contract deliberately, and clear municipal balances through escrow at the closing table.

Financing, the local-bank reality 0/5

Five or more units means commercial credit. The loan changes shape, and many first-time buyers discover the new shape during escrow.

  • Past the residential cutoff, the mortgage market changes: local banks and credit unions become the core lender pool, terms commonly run shorter with balloons or rate resets, recourse with a personal guarantee is common in local-bank executions (agency and some portfolio programs differ), and the property's documented income carries the approval more than your salary does. Agency small-balance programs exist for qualifying buildings, with standards of their own.

    Bad answer looks like:
    An underwriting model built on residential-mortgage assumptions: long fixed terms, light documentation, no personal exposure.
    Verify with:
    Term sheets from two or three lenders that actually close small multifamily in this market, with amortization, term, reset, recourse, and covenant language in writing.
    Next move:
    Underwrite on the term sheets in hand, not on the loan you wish existed.
  • Commercial lenders size the loan from debt service coverage using their own underwriting: their vacancy, their management fee, their reserves. A building that cannot cover at the lender's numbers gets a smaller loan than you modeled, and the difference arrives as an equity call at closing.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A contract signed at a price whose required loan the property's documented income cannot support.
    Verify with:
    The coverage calculation run on the reconciled T12 with the lender's actual expense loads, checked against the term sheet's stated requirement.
    Next move:
    Size your maximum price from the documented income and the lender's coverage floor, and know where extra equity would come from before you need it.
  • Commercial appraisals put real weight on the income approach (alongside sales and cost where applicable), so every number you failed to verify earlier returns as valuation. An appraisal below contract on a commercial loan does not just shrink the loan; it reopens the whole deal.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A price that only appraises if the appraiser adopts the seller's pro forma over the building's own records.
    Verify with:
    Your income-approach math on the reconciled numbers, and a conversation with the lender about how appraisals have been landing for this building type in this submarket.
    Next move:
    Negotiate an appraisal contingency or a written gap plan (price triggers, added equity, seller carry) before your deposit becomes nonrefundable.
  • The seller's loan can carry prepayment penalties that set their real floor price, or occasionally an assumable note worth more than the building's paint. Small sellers also carry financing themselves more often than institutions do, which can solve problems the banks will not.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A negotiation run with no idea what payoff the seller faces, or seller-carry terms accepted without the scrutiny a bank note would get.
    Verify with:
    The existing note's payoff and assumption terms where relevant, and any proposed seller financing modeled through your full hold, balloon included.
    Next move:
    Structure around the debt reality on both sides of the table. It moves price, timing, and sometimes the whole capital stack.
  • Small-multifamily debt commonly matures or resets before the business plan finishes. A balloon is a forced refinance on a market that does not exist yet, and the time to take it seriously is before you sign the term sheet.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A balloon that lands mid-renovation, with no modeled path through the payoff.
    Verify with:
    The refinance modeled at the balloon date under unfriendly assumptions (slower rent growth, higher rates, a stingier lender), plus the covenant and guarantee language for what happens if coverage slips.
    Next move:
    Pick the term structure that survives your slow case, and keep the personal-guarantee exposure in view the whole way.

Market reality, shopped in person 0/3

Small multifamily is street by street. The metro narrative says little about which side of the block this building rents from.

  • The rents that matter are the ones a tenant can choose instead of yours, this month, within the same commute and school boundaries. An afternoon of inquiry calls and a couple of showings beat any published average for the question you are actually asking.

    Bad answer looks like:
    Pro forma rents above what identical units nearby quote with move-in specials, or a claimed premium with nothing observable behind it.
    Verify with:
    Current listings for comparable units, real quotes and concessions gathered by inquiring as a renter, and time-on-market for the closest competitors.
    Next move:
    Underwrite the rents your shopping proved, and let the gap between proof and pitch move the price.
  • Value-add math assumes a renovated unit rents for more, here, on this street. The cleanest evidence is a unit this building or its nearest comparable has already renovated and leased; without one, the premium is a hypothesis you are being asked to pay for in advance.

    Bad answer looks like:
    A renovation budget priced to a rent no unit at the property has ever achieved, supported by comps from a better street.
    Verify with:
    Leases on any already-renovated units in the building, renovated-unit rents at genuinely comparable buildings nearby, and your own bids for the scope.
    Next move:
    Run the return on the premium you can evidence. If it is unproven, buy the building at a price that works without it.
  • A small building's demand pool is hyperlocal: the employers within a short commute, the condition of the surrounding parcels, what is being permitted within a few blocks. Citywide statistics smooth over exactly the boundary lines that decide this building's tenancy.

    Bad answer looks like:
    An investment story built on a metro headline while the surrounding blocks show disinvestment the windshield can see.
    Verify with:
    A walk of the surrounding blocks at different hours, nearby permit activity in the jurisdiction's records, and conversations with anyone operating rentals close by.
    Next move:
    Underwrite the micro-location the building actually occupies, and let the block evidence set your growth assumptions.

Frequently asked

What kills the most multifamily deals?

Three findings lead the list. Financial fiction: a T12 that cannot be reconciled to the bank record and the filed return, usually traveling with loss-to-lease claims the building's own leases contradict. The capital clock: original plumbing, electrical, or roofing whose replacement cost erases the equity story. And financing reality: a commercial appraisal or a coverage calculation that will not support the contract price. All three are checkable before you pay for reports, which is why this checklist opens with the T12 and closes with the loan.

How is buying a 5 to 50 unit building different from buying a house or duplex?

At five units, most lending moves to commercial credit: the building's documented income drives approval, terms shorten with balloons or rate resets, and local banks commonly ask for a personal guarantee. Valuation leans much harder on the income approach, which makes the T12 and rent roll the raw material of the appraisal. Diligence deepens too, into certificates of occupancy, code files, and lease-by-lease audits that a single-family purchase never required. The building is small; the transaction is commercial.

What is a T12, and why does this checklist lean on it so hard?

A T12 (trailing twelve months) is the property's month-by-month operating statement for the last year. It matters because it is the closest thing to ground truth a seller offers, and because most of the ways a deal gets dressed for sale (a pre-listing rent push, repairs quietly deferred, one-time credits) are visible in the monthly columns and invisible in an annual summary. Read it month by month, reconcile it against bank statements and the tax return, and treat reluctance to provide any of the three as a finding in itself.

How do I verify the rents are real?

In three layers. Paper: pull every signed lease and match it to the rent roll, watching recent leases with thin application files. Cash: reconcile scheduled rent against what actually reached the bank each month. Market: shop comparable vacant units as a prospective tenant and note what is being quoted, concessions included. A rent that survives all three layers is real; one that fails any of them is a question with a price attached.

What documents should I request first?

Start with the set that surfaces problems fastest: the monthly T12 with two prior years of statements, the current rent roll with every signed lease file, a year of bank statements, the certificate of occupancy, a year of utility bills for every account, and the insurance loss-run history. That set powers most of this checklist early in the contingency period, and if the seller stalls on producing it, weigh the stalling too.

Put this checklist to work on a real deal

Upload the offering memo, rent roll, or trailing twelve months. CREscope structures the editable underwriting case and tracks the full diligence library deal by deal. Your first deal is free.

Analyze your first deal free

Related resources

Disclaimer

This checklist is general educational information for buyers conducting their own due diligence. It is not exhaustive, and it is not an appraisal, opinion of value, or investment, legal, tax, or engineering advice. Property conditions and local rules vary; engage qualified professionals (counsel, inspectors, and environmental and utility specialists) for any transaction.